Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- v3vsmaft [2010/02/13 05:11]
twdorris
+++ v3vsmaft [2010/02/13 05:12]
twdorris
@@ Line 6: / Line 6: @@
 The answer is, "it depends".  First, if your MAFT setup is currently working fine for you and you have no interest in clearing out your engine bay or having more direct control over the MAF translation function, then by all means leave well enough alone.  No reason to upset a working solution just to change it.
-But, if you'd like to remove some clutter under the hood or you'd like to have more direct (and finer-grained) control over the MAF translation function, then consider replacing the GM MAFT with our direct cable and V3's GM MAF function.
+But, if you'd like to remove some clutter under the hood or you'd like to have more direct (and finer-grained) control over the MAF translation function, then consider replacing the GM MAFT with our direct cable and V3's GM MAF function.  Our cable also provides some convenient [[gmmafiatbaro|break outs]] for access to the baro and IAT inputs of the ECU, which can be handy when wiring in [[installnewsensor|aftermarket sensors]] for logging.
-Our cable also provides some convenient [[gmmafiatbaro|break outs]] for access to the baro and IAT inputs of the ECU.
 ===== Finer-grained adjustments =====

ECMTuning - wiki