This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision | |||
v3vsmaft [2010/02/13 05:12] twdorris |
v3vsmaft [2024/03/15 11:16] (current) |
||
---|---|---|---|
Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
But with a GM MAF straight to the ECU, you would typically idle around the 500hz. That seems trivial until you consider the next and previous adjustment points provided in ECMLink of 600hz and 400hz... Those are, again, in GM MAF frequencies. They correspond to roughly 70hz and 30hz for a factory sensor. So, effectively you have adjustment points at roughly 0, 10, 30, 50, 70hz and 90hz if you're running a GM MAF straight to the ECU instead of the 0, 50, and 100 you would have with a MAFT or a factory sensor in the same idling conditions. So you get a lot more fine-grained control over the translation when running a GM MAF straight to the ECU. | But with a GM MAF straight to the ECU, you would typically idle around the 500hz. That seems trivial until you consider the next and previous adjustment points provided in ECMLink of 600hz and 400hz... Those are, again, in GM MAF frequencies. They correspond to roughly 70hz and 30hz for a factory sensor. So, effectively you have adjustment points at roughly 0, 10, 30, 50, 70hz and 90hz if you're running a GM MAF straight to the ECU instead of the 0, 50, and 100 you would have with a MAFT or a factory sensor in the same idling conditions. So you get a lot more fine-grained control over the translation when running a GM MAF straight to the ECU. | ||
- | We also have a built-in function to help dial a GM MAF configuration in. You can read more about it on the [[http://www.ecmtuning.com/wiki/v3mafadjcombft|GM MAF Adj page]]. | + | We also have a built-in function to help dial a GM MAF configuration in. You can read more about it on the [[https://www.ecmtuning.com/wiki/v3mafadjcombft|GM MAF Adj page]]. |